When it comes to constitutional legality, Sujitt Choudhry is an expert. Over the last two decades, he has made a name for himself within the constitution sector of law. The expertise that he has garnered can be attributed to his vigorous studies and research. The west coast professor also operates a blog that gives insight to the world of constitutional law.
Sujit Choudhry recently wrote a blogpost disgusting the difference between hate speech and freedom of speech. In the article he uses a recent Washington DC rally as an example. One issue he brought up is the amount of money that taxpayers had to dish out; in regards to potential conflicts. He states that society often views protests as a violent outcome. This is not always the case however, and taxpayers take the financial blow. Sujit points out The first amendment, which states Congress shall make no law penalizing freedom of speech, and the right to peacefully assemble. He also uses famous court cases to prove this point such as Schenck v. Unites States in 1917. Schenck was initially charged with violating the First Amendment, and the ruling was overturned.
Another article written by Sujit Choudhry touched base on presidential revoking of security clearances. In the post, he discusses recent actions of Donald Trump. The president had announced that he would be revoking numerous security clearances for officials who oppose him. There has been historical cases in which security clearances were revoked for abusing authority, but this situation appears to be slightly different. National security is a heavily-debated topic.
Find out more here https://medium.com/@SujitChoudhry